colorlessgreenideas: Luna Lovegood (wit)
- Anna Hathaway impresses me more and more every time I see her in something. Her singing is breathtaking, she oozes emotion at all the right times, and she's gorgeous even when she's bloody and filthy and miserable. It will be an interesting switch for me to make whenever I finally watch her as Catwoman.

- Sasha Baron Cohen as the Innkeeper was perfect. It never would have occurred to me to cast him until I saw him in the part. Brilliant.

- The only actor who underwhelmed me was Russell Crowe. He wasn't bad, but the emotional range of his singing just stayed in a sort of safe range, without hitting any high or low notes as it should have. Maybe he was focusing on hitting the notes and couldn't manage to emote, or maybe I'm missing some subtlety. Or, I'm just really used to the guy who played Javier in the well-known London production, which I have the soundtrack for. On the other hand, the same could be said for every other character, and no one else left me feeling wanting like Russell Crowe did.

- Speaking of Javier, I did think it was interesting how a man whose life revolves around "honesty" found it so easy to become a spy. Sure, it worked towards his own end, but it seemed a little out of character.

- Romantic moral of the story: givin the choice of a "boyish" brunette who's familiar, adoring, and willing to go the extra mile, the object of affection will instead go for the very feminine blonde he or she has just met. I'm so not bitter. But yeah, I might've teared up during "On My Own."

- Speaking of Marius and Cosette. Even though I knew what was going to happen, I half-expected him to drop her after the whole ordeal at the barricades. All of his friends are dead, he's realized that not only was Eponine in love with him, but she died for him, and he was on the edge of death himself. He saw a child killed by soldiers, and felt the rest of the city abandon their cause. That's some serious mental baggage, and Cosette's wanting to just pick up where they left off after a brief conversation and some lusting after each other. I know it would've gone against the romantic feel of the story, but I think it would've been more realistic for him to reconsider, or at least take some time before jumping into the lust again. But maybe he did, and the movie just skipped over all that.
colorlessgreenideas: (everybody)
I don't usually write up reviews of films, partly because I can't go back to check on bits after I'm done. Nor do I usually give much thought at all to films by Quentin Tarantino. But I watched Django last night with a friend, and found I have things to say about it.

Django Unchained from what I've heard, has the same basic premise as Tarantino's film Inglorious Bastards, which I never watched. It is, at any rate, revisionist history which has a member of an abused group going after the abusers, and killing them in pure Tarantino fashion. There is blood, and LOTS of it. Somehow, when I saw the premise for Inglorious Bastards, I was unimpressed, and a little bothered. But with Django, I kind of liked it. Maybe it's because the idea of killing Nazis is old hat, but the US, and the South especially, turn a blind eye to slave owners most of the time. While most Americans know, to some extent, that yeah, slavery was "bad," we don't think of the masters as evil. Are they on the same level as Nazis? No, but the biggest difference is that Nazis wanted all Jews, etc GONE. Southern whites never wanted blacks GONE, because there would go their labor force. But they sure thought up some hellish things to put them through. And the whole ideology of racial inferiority was the damn same. That, and you still find Americans willing to defend the institution of slavery, openly and in public. Americans who try to soften the pain that was caused by slavery, by saying that "Well, a lot of owners were nice." Yes, they were, but that doesn't change the institution. Blacks, slave or free, were always at the mercy of whites. It was a white person's choice how nice to be, and a black person just had to take it. A few nice white folks doesn't make that okay.

On to the film, though. The characters were compelling and believable, in so much as Tarantino characters usually are. Django as a master gun slinger worked, and it was fun to see him blow holes in hateful people. Leonardo DiCaprio impressed me as the sadistic master, and it was easy to see both sides of him: the cruel slave owner who has runaways torn apart by dogs, and the cultured man of the time. I was underwhelmed by Django's wife, Brunnhilda. The actress did fine. The problem was that she was really just a pretty face who needed rescuing all the time. Partly, it fit the story's parallel with the Wagnerian epic or Brunnhilda and Siegfried, which Dr. Schultz tells Django during the film. Partly, I think that we as a culture can do better than that, and flesh out our female characters a little bit more.

The gore didn't get me much, but there were definitely parts I needed to turn away from - the aforementioned dogs tearing a man apart, and a man who's eyes are gauged out. But yeah, seriously a lot of blood in this film.

Profile

colorlessgreenideas: Luna Lovegood (Default)
colorlessgreenideas

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910 111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 28th, 2025 05:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios